Unsatisfactory (50% of max marls)

Satisfactory(70% of max marks)

Good (85% of max marks)

Excellent (Max Marks)

Delivery

Max Marks: 10

Completed less than 70% of the requirements.
Not delivered on time or not in correct/project format

Completed between 70-80% of the requirements.
Delivered on time, and in correct format

Completed between 80-90% of the requirements.
Delivered on time, and in correct format

Completed between 90-100% of the requirements.
Delivered on time, and in correct format

Coding Standards

Max Marks: 30

No name, date, or assignment title included
Poor use of white space (indentation, blank lines).
Disorganized and messy
Poor use of variables (many global variables, ambiguous naming).
No comments included
Plagiarism detected

Includes name, date, and assignment title.
White space makes program fairly easy to read.
Organized work.
Good use of variables (few global variables, unambiguous naming).
Basic comments including description of all variables
Purpose is noted for each function
Slight plagiarism detected

Includes name, date, and assignment title.
Good use of white space.
Organized work.
Good use of variables (no global variables, unambiguous naming)
Clear comments including descriptions of all variables
Specific purpose is noted for each function and control structure
No plagiarism

Includes name, date, and assignment title.
Excellent use of white space.
Creatively organized work.
Excellent use of variables (no global variables, unambiguous naming).
Clear and effective comments including description of all variables
Specific purpose is noted for each function, control structure, input requirements, and output results
No Plagiarism

Runtime

Max Marks: 40

Does not execute due to errors.
User prompts are misleading or non-existent.
No testing has been completed.

Executes without errors.
User prompts contain little information, poor design.
Some testing has been completed.

Executes without errors.
User prompts are understandable, minimum use of symbols or spacing in output.
Thorough testing has been completed

Executes without errors excellent user prompts, good use of symbols, spacing in output.
Thorough and organized testing has been completed and output from test cases is included.

Efficiency of the solution

Max Marks: 10

A difficult and inefficient solution.

A logical solution that is easy to follow but it is not the most efficient.

Solution is efficient and easy to follow (i.e. no confusing tricks).

Solution is efficient, easy to understand, and maintain.

General knowledge(viva)

Varies with the problem (Marks between 0 and 10 as decided by the evaluator)

	Unsatisfactory (50% of max marls)	Satisfactory(70% of max marks)	Good (85% of max marks)	Excellent (Max Marks)
Delivery Max Marks: 10	Completed less than 70% of the requirements. Not delivered on time or not in correct/project format	Completed between 70-80% of the requirements. Delivered on time, and in correct format	Completed between 80-90% of the requirements. Delivered on time, and in correct format	Completed between 90-100% of the requirements. Delivered on time, and in correct format
Coding Standards Max Marks: 30	No name, date, or assignment title included Poor use of white space (indentation, blank lines). Disorganized and messy Poor use of variables (many global variables, ambiguous naming). No comments included Plagiarism detected	Includes name, date, and assignment title. White space makes program fairly easy to read. Organized work. Good use of variables (few global variables, unambiguous naming). Basic comments including description of all variables Purpose is noted for each function Slight plagiarism detected	Includes name, date, and assignment title. Good use of white space. Organized work. Good use of variables (no global variables, unambiguous naming) Clear comments including descriptions of all variables Specific purpose is noted for each function and control structure No plagiarism	Includes name, date, and assignment title. Excellent use of white space. Creatively organized work. Excellent use of variables (no global variables, unambiguous naming). Clear and effective comments including description of all variables Specific purpose is noted for each function, control structure, input requirements, and output results No Plagiarism
Runtime Max Marks: 40	Does not execute due to errors. User prompts are misleading or non-existent. No testing has been completed.	Executes without errors. User prompts contain little information, poor design. Some testing has been completed.	Executes without errors. User prompts are understandable, minimum use of symbols or spacing in output. Thorough testing has been completed	Executes without errors excellent user prompts, good use of symbols, spacing in output. Thorough and organized testing has been completed and output from test cases is included.
Efficiency of the solution Max Marks: 10	A difficult and inefficient solution.	A logical solution that is easy to follow but it is not the most efficient.	Solution is efficient and easy to follow (i.e. no confusing tricks).	Solution is efficient, easy to understand, and maintain.
General knowledge(viva) 10	Varies with the problem (Marks between 0 and 10 as decided by the evaluator)